Name
Last Updated
Views
Favorites
Contributors

S. Rowe vs. U.S.A. INC.

LIFE, LIBERTY, & THE PURSUIT OF TRUTH

Statements contained herein are true and have been notarized to be submitted to the court of record

AFFIRMATION OF LIFE, LIBERTY AND THE PURSUIT OF TRUTH

Steffen Rowe, 12/7/2019

I, a living soul, Sui Juris, being of age, of sound mind, and competent nature, affirm this statement of my own volition without influence or perversion by any outside source. The statements herein are the truth as experienced by me, witnessed by me, and verified by research completed by experts in their respective fields of study as it pertains to the issues described in this lawful document. Supporting evidence, including files, links, and photographs have been provided to support the claims of the statements made in this document. This affidavit is for recourse that a freeman is entitled, recorded as of truth under the penalty of perjury and reserving the right to amend and be notified if any line item is proven at error without recourse and without prejudice.

Section Summary

Collective discovery

TO IDENTIFY & ENFORCE LAW

The Constitution gives the people the authority to identify and take lawful action against the government or any entity appearing as the governing body has overstepped their authority, or claimed an authority they do not have. All government officials are public servants and subject to the will of the people

The collective findings, explanations, and research into the mandatory state statutes to administer vaccines to all individuals by removing the religious and conscience freedoms of the American people explained in this document prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that the accused individuals and entities in question have dramatically overstepped their contractual obligations to uphold the Constitution and to operate within the spirit or letter of the Law of the Land. The actions of the government assemblies that have made these decisions are in violation of the Constitution and are therefore guilty of treason for waging war against the American people.

At this time, We the People are claiming our rightful jurisdiction over ourselves and this land. As the authority responsible to uphold the Law of the Land, we do not recognize the governance of the United Nations or any entity falling underneath the umbrella of their control, influence, or governance as the authority over God, the people, or the government. This includes those who have unlawfully acted as foreign agents claiming regulatory authority over several aspects of American society as well as the World Health Organization that has defined new meanings for the term “informed consent” to justify the unlawful vaccination of children while they are in attendance at school without parental consent.

 

We reject their newly revised definition, or any attempt to define informed consent, and find any parties complicit with such an action to be in violation of the Treaty of Versailles and we thus identify this action as an act of war against the American people. This is a violation of the fundamental rights of the people as defined by the American Constitution of which neither the United Nations, nor the W.H.O., the health care authority within the U.N., have the authority to dictate policy to or power over the American individuals. The supreme Law of the Land in America is the Constitution; in this, the rights of the people are protected and guaranteed, and no emergency, whether real or fabricated can override the unalienable rights of the people as stated in the Constitution. 

All parties are hereby required to change their course of action in reference to their position as a government employee to aid, justify, or illegally administer vaccines, or to facilitate or allow any activity that aids this process, or to create the appearance of laws that mandate such an action without the informed consent of the risks, benefits, and process whereby said information has been obtained. Full disclosure, confirmed comprehension, and the uncompromised agreement of the people is required as part of our Human Rights as established during the Nuremberg Trials under the Treaty of Versailles. Every employee of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA INCORPORATED are acting as foreign agents and are bound to uphold the u.S. Constitution to protect the rights of the people.

Section Summary

Law of the land

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

Unalienable rights as defined in the Constitution cannot be taken away from an individual by any government or any other entity because they are rights given by God or from birth and are therefore owned by each individual to govern for themselves

As has been established by the Law of the Land, “at the Revolution, the sovereignty devolved on the people; and they are truly the sovereigns of the country, but they are sovereigns without subjects … with none to govern but themselves; the citizens of America are equal as fellow citizens, and as joint tenants in the sovereignty,” Chisholm v. Georgia, (U.S.) 2 Dall. 419, 454, 1 L.Ed. 440, 455, pp. 471-472 (1793). We the People retain the rights exclusively over the decisions made about our personal health as well as the responsibility for the care, custody and control of our children. To infringe upon these unalienable rights is to rob a man or woman of their birthright. This is a violation of the Laws of Nature, and the supporting judgement allowing such changes to take place did not have authority over the people or God to make such a decision, as they are public servants. 

Therefore, because the government draws its power from the governed, the duty falls upon the people to stand and declare the nature of the crimes committed within the government, and to decide the appropriate course of action to compensate the damaged parties. The Guardian of Camelot Association’s Constitutional Enforcement and Investigation Team, Lawful America, the National Liberty Alliance, and all those who wish to contribute from the general public will be invited to vote on the conclusions of each section of this document.

 

This is to provide a fair representation of the free will of the American people to be counted in the decision making process about the proper steps forward to restore constitutional law by the people, who are the highest court in the land. There will be recommendations to take immediate action against all government entities who are currently violating the unalienable rights of the people in thought, words, or deeds to the extent as can be proven with the evidence provided in the attached exhibits of this document. All parties who have knowingly or unknowingly acted on or supported such violations are denied any plausible deniability after the publication of this notice.

 

Described parties will be given a 40-day period to come under constitutional compliance at which time indictments for civil and criminal infractions will be filed in the court of record and immediate action will be taken within the reasonable power of the law.

Heading 2

The People's Court

PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY

“It is no longer open to question that the general government, unlike the states. Hammer v. Dagenhart, 247 U.S 251, 275 38 ct, 529, 3 A.L.R 649, Ann. Cas.1918E 724, possesses no inherent power in respect of the internal affairs of the states; and emphatically not with regards to legislation.” [Carter v. Carter Coal Co. 298 U.S 238 56 S. C.t 855 (1936)]

We the People possess the authority as given to us by the u.S. Constitution to call a court and pass judgement against those elected officials sitting in seats of power and influence within the Corporate Government. The power of elected and appointed officials is afforded to them by the governed and is contingent upon their observation of their contractual obligations, which are stated clearly in the u.S. Constitution.

 

This applies to officials in both the Federal and State Governments. “It is no longer open to question that the general government, unlike the states Hammer v. Dagenhart, 247 U.S 251, 275 38 ct, 529, 3 A.L.R 649, Ann. Cas.1918E 724, possesses no inherent power in respect of the internal affairs of the states; and emphatically not with regard to legislation.” Carter v. Carter Coal Co., 298 U.S 238 56 S. C.t 855 (1936). 

 

I am one of the people, a free natural indigenous American human, born within the State of New York, where I still reside today.

Declaration of Independence

PRACTICAL APPLICATION

Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness – That to secure these Rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the Consent of the Governed, that whichever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these Ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or abolish it… “No duty rests more imperatively upon the courts than the enforcement of those constitutional provisions intended to secure that equality of rights which is the foundation of free government” [Gulf. C & S.F.R CO. v Ellis, 165 U.S. 150 (1897)] 

all “just powers” of government derive from the consent of those governed. Any attempt to civilly enforce governed. Any attempt to civilly enforce must be preceded by an explicit written attempt to procure consent, to not punish those who do not consent, and to not presume consent by virtue of even submitting a government form that does not identify the submission of the form is an implied act of consent.

The Declaration of Independence for the united States of America outlined the necessary course each natural American human must take when his government becomes insufferable. Over the past one hundred years, nearly all of our unalienable rights have been stripped with the assistance of sophistry and obfuscation by the courts and government officials. These acts are egregious, the Declaration of Independence points out, “ … all experience hath shown that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the Forms to which they are accustomed.” That same Declaration also declared, “We hold these truths to be self evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness – That to secure these Rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the Consent of the Governed, that whichever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these Ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or abolish it … ” No duty rests more imperatively upon the courts than the enforcement of those constitutional provisions intended to secure that equality of rights which is the foundation of free government,” Gulf, C. & S.F.R CO. v. Ellis, 165 U.S. 150 (1897).

The Declaration of Independence states that all “just powers” of government derive from the consent of those governed. All government is voluntary and any attempt to civilly enforce in any manner must be preceded by an explicit written attempt to procure consent, to not punish those who do not consent, and to not presume consent by virtue of submitting a government form that does not identify the submission of the form is an implied act of consent. “Every type of DE JURE CIVIL governmental service or regulation MUST be voluntary and ALL must be offered the right to NOT participate on every governmental form that administers such a CIVIL program. It shall mandatorily, publicly, and NOTORIOUSLY be enforced and prosecuted as a crime NOT to offer the right to NOT PARTICIPATE in any CIVIL STATUTORY activity of government or to call a service ‘VOLUNTARY’ but actively interfere with and/or persecute those who REFUSE to volunteer or INSIST on unvolunteering. All statements by any government actor or government form or publication relating to the right to volunteer shall be treated as statements under penalty of perjury for which the head of the governmental department shall be held PERSONALLY liable if false. EVERY CIVIL ‘benefit’ or activity offered by any government MUST identify at the beginning of ever law creating the program that the program is VOLUNTARY and HOW specifically to UNVOLUNTEER or quit the program. Any violation of these rules makes the activity NON-GOVERNMENTAL in nature AND makes those offering the program into a DE FACTO government.” (Source: Family Guardian Fellowship)

The Bill of Rights

REMAINS WITH THE PEOPLE

The Supreme Court said that the “rights of life and personal liberty are the natural rights of man. To secure these rights… governments are instituted among men” US v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S 542, 2 Otto 542, 23 L. Ed. 588. The individual guarantees by our Constitution and treaties cannot be compromised or ignored by our government or by its courts.

The Bill of Rights defines the most often “government” abused individual liberties. It forbids the Federal Government to violate any of our unalienable rights of the people and as well to reserve all other rights that are not delegated to the United States, to the States: The State’s authority and sovereign rights would be determined by the people in the individual state Constitutions. All rights not delegated to the Federal-or- State Governments by the people remains with the people.  


 

According to the u.S. Constitution which is the Law of the Land, established by the people, for the people, and of the people, to define and enforce the laws common to the American inhabitants needed to form and maintain a functional government, that protects and upholds the fundamental rights of the American people. The government as well as all those contracted by them are contractually bound by the terms therein to act in accordance with the u.S Constitution to protect and defend the laws within that work to this end.  


 

I hereby bequest for relief and command the administrators as public servants of “We the People”  to read this thoroughly, completely and with comprehension, this document is of a very serious nature and is not frivolous.  There will be no presumptions or assumptions, no Tacit agreements, no waiver of rights, no hearsay, no lawyering or attornment from the bench. I am requiring only the Truth, Facts, Honor and Fair Justice. 

 

The Supreme Court said that the “rights of life and personal liberty are the natural rights of man. To secure these rights… governments are instituted among men” US v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S 542, 2 Otto 542, 23 L. Ed. 588. The individual guarantees by our Constitution and treaties cannot be compromised or ignored by our government or by its courts.

DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE, LINKS,&THE COMPLETE ARGUMENT ARE BEING POSTED NOW. CHECK BACK AFTER 4PM FOR UPDATES

U.S.A. INC.

EXISTS BY PERMISSION

The U.S.A.INC. does not hold jurisdiction over the power of the people, nor does any fictitious 

corporate entity have control over the people

The Bill of Rights guarantees that government cannot infringe, nor continue to infringe upon the rights of the American people and is designed to ensure that the power of the government and its branches are kept in check. Its constitutional amendments specifically guarantee the rights of the people and set clear limitations of governmental power that have been perverted, misinterpreted and obscured.
 
It forbids the federal government from violating any of the unalienable rights of the people and reserves all other rights that are not delegated to the United States, for the states. The state’s authority and sovereign rights are determined by the people and all rights not delegated to the Federal or State governments by the people remains with the people. 

The u.S. Constitution, as the Law of the Land, established by the people, for the people, and of the people, to define and enforce the laws common to the American inhabitants needed to form and maintain a functional government, protects and upholds the fundamental rights of the American people. The government as well as all those contracted by them are contractually bound by the terms therein to act in accordance with the u.S Constitution to protect and defend the laws within that work to this end. 

I hereby bequest for relief and command the administrators as public servants of “We the People” to read this thoroughly, completely and with comprehension. This document is of very serious nature and is not frivolous. There will be no presumptions or assumptions, no tacit or implied agreements, no waiver of rights, no hearsay, no lawyering nor attornment from the bench. I am requiring only the Truth, Facts, Honor and Fair Justice. 

The Supreme Court stated that the “rights of life and personal liberty are the natural rights of man. To secure these rights, governments are instituted among men,” US v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S 542, 2 Otto 542, 23 L. Ed. 588 (1875). The individual guarantees by our Constitution and treaties cannot be compromised or ignored by our government or by its courts. 

This document is being recorded to hold accountable the individuals and entities operating as part of the government or as contracted foreign agents who have sworn under oath or who were meant to swear under oath, as is required in Title 5, Section 3331 of the United States Code. The founders required an oath for all federal and state officials to uphold, protect, and defend the rights afforded the lawful residents of this land. 

The UNITED STATES government, the state governments, all of their agencies, and subdivisions such as the city, county, boroughs, townships and banks are registered as corporations. 

According to California Commercial Code 9307, "The UNITED STATES is located in the District of Columbia." The laws they pass only apply to the federal corporate venues identified by zip code or in the 100 sq. mile DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.

UNITED STATES Government Corporation was created February 21, 1871 by the Forty-First Congress, Section 34, Session III, chapters 61 and 62, “An Act To Provide A Government for the District of Columbia.” This is also known as the “Act of 1871.”

This is reflected in U.S. Code, Title 28 – JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE, (Chapter 176) Section 3002 (15) (a, b, & c); which states that:

(15) ” United States ” means – (A) a Federal corporation; (B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the United States; (C) an instrumentality of the United States.

Corpus Juris Secundum, the second body of law, states: "The United States Government is a foreign corporation with respect to a state.” Volume 20: Corpus Juris Secundum, (P 1785: NY re: Merriam 36 N.E. 505 1441 S.Ct. 1973, 41 L. Ed. 287)”

Black's Law 2nd Edition

CORPORATIONS=ARTIFICIAL PERSONS

All such corporate fictions are established by a set of rules called by-laws. Public (government) corporations use the term constitution as their by-laws. These by-laws are nothing more than an offer to the people of the forum the government intends to use to govern.  The American private sector, although included within the offer, were never given the offer to officially vote for or against, nor to make an official acceptance or rejection.

All corporations are fictions or artificial persons created under the authority of the law. 

According to Black’s Law 2nd Edition:

“Corporations – an artificial person or legal entity created by or under the authority of the laws of a state or nation, composed, in some rare instances, of a single person and his successors, being the incumbents of a particular office, but ordinarily consisting of an association of numerous individuals, who subsist as a body politic under a special denomination, which is regarded in law as having a personality and existence distinct from that of its several members, and which is, by the same authority, vested with the capacity of continuous succession, irrespective of changes in its membership, either in perpetuity or for a limited term of years, and of acting as a unit or single individual in matters relating to the common purpose of the association, within the scope of the powers and authorities conferred upon such bodies by law. See Case of Sutton’s Hospital, 10 Coke. 32; Dartmouth College v. Woodward, 4 Wheat. 518, 636, 657. 4 L. Ed. 629; U. S. v. Trinidad Coal Co., 137 U. S. 160, 11 Sup. Ct. 57. 34 L. Ed. 640; Andrews Bros. Co. v. Youngstown Coke Co., 86 Fed. 585, 30 C. C. A. 293; Porter v. Railroad Co., 76 111. 573; State v. Payne, 129 Mo. 468, 31 S. W. 797. 33 L. R. A. 576; Farmers’ L. & T. Co. v. New York, 7 Hill (N. Y.) 2S3; State Bl.Law Dict.(2d Ed.).

All such corporate fictions are established by a set of rules called by-laws. Public (government) corporations use the term “constitution” as their by-laws. These by-laws are nothing more than an offer to the people of the forum the government intends to use to govern. The American private sector, although included within the offer, were never given the offer to officially vote for or against, nor to make an official acceptance or rejection. Thus, no contract involving private Americans as a party to the u.S. Constitution exists. A contract has been defined as an agreement containing a promise enforceable in law. The term “agreement” implies that there are at least two parties involved, since one party cannot agree to a proposition unless it is made to him by another party. The term further implies that one party proposed a promise or offer to which the other party agreed or accepted. Thus, the agreement is the result of an offer by one party and the acceptance by the other party which creates a binding contract.

Civil Court System

IN VIOLATION OF THE CONSTITUTION

The “implied consent” or “silence” as our consent, cannot be applied to infer authority over our fundamental rights, as these rights are unalienable and immutable to the humanity of the people and the foundation of the Republic.

The current court system is in violation of the u.S. Constitution and thus is noncompliant with their private contract with mankind.

We the People, the private sector as the lawful indigenous residents of America have never formally “accepted” any offer to be ruled, judged, or governed by a legal system that is in violation of our lawful constitutional guarantees. In 1871, the united States of America became The United States of America Corporation without the disclosure of the facts and without a vote of the people. With the 14th Amendment redefining the word “Person” all of us were made US citizens without full disclosure of what that meant and implied we were all slaves and residents of Washington D. C. 

According to Black’s Law 2nd edition: “A citizen is a member of a free city or jural society possessing all the rights and privileges which can be enjoyed by any person under its constitution and government, and subject to the corresponding duties. Citizens are members of community inspired to common goal, who, in associated relations, submit themselves to roles of conduct for the promotion of general welfare and conservation of individual as well as collective rights.”  

The “implied consent” or “silence” as our consent cannot be applied to infer authority over our fundamental rights, as these rights are unalienable and immutable to the humanity of the people and the foundation of the Republic. Furthermore, any private contract with American individuals would require the free will choice of each individual American, and only after they have expressed their clear comprehension of the terms being offered can their verbal or written consent be considered a lawful and binding agreement. Silence in this case has been a result of the American individuals having a lack of comprehension of the terms being offered by the court system and government officials.

 

This ignorance has been caused by the government overreaching their contractual authority as public servants in the form of dereliction of duties, and the apparent intent to defraud and control the American people. The government has created the illusion that the unalienable rights of the American individuals can be taken away by the authority of the legislative system, then enforced in the court system without due process.

Black's Law 4th Edition

UNALIENABLE & IMPOSSIBLE 

Regardless of the corporate guidelines or U.S. Codes established by the U.S. Corporation that govern their internal operation, they are still bound to uphold the Natural Laws defined within the American Constitution. Regardless of the codes established by the corporate government, if they violate the Constitutional rights of the governed, from which they draw their power, then the people do not have any obligation to comply with, nor does the government have the authority to enforce said codes.

Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition, p.1693 states, “Unalienable, Inalienable, Incapable of being aligned, that is sold and transferred.” 

All branches of the government draw their power from the governed, and have no power to dictate policy of any kind that is not in alignment with the Constitution authorized by the consent of the American people. Therefore, whether the offer is by the u.S Constitution, or the constitution of the individual state government corporation (a/k/a … “this state”) where we live our private lives, it is impossible to justify the violation of our fundamental rights based on our silence being used as consent, as proper informed consent was never provided, and therefore proper comprehension of terms could not be made clear for the individual to use their free will to make a decision to consent or not to consent to terms.

 

The American private sector has never formally agreed to accept the oath of any government worker to uphold and defend the Constitution, which is required by the Universal Commercial Code (UCC) that governs the civil agreements of the UNITED STATES CORPORATION, which is not to be confused with the laws defined by the Constitution as the Law of the Land. Regardless of the corporate guidelines or U.S. Codes established by the U.S. Corporation that govern their internal operation, they are still bound to uphold the Natural Laws defined within the American Constitution.

 

Regardless of the codes established by the corporate government, if they violate the constitutional rights of the governed from which they draw their power, then the people do not have any obligation to comply with, nor does the government have the authority to enforce said codes. These codes are in effect null and void of any power whatsoever, and any effort to try and enforce such codes, whether knowingly or unknowingly aware of their unconstitutional nature by any government employee is an act of treason and an act of war against the freedom of the American individual. 

For a contract to be in force which defines any terms of agreement between the U.S. Corporation and the American people, it is essential that both sides are given the opportunity to consent or decline in writing after all terms are fully disclosed. Such action to withhold content, discovery, or facts, or to act without the consent of the people by presuming consent is a violation of the due process clause of the 14th Amendment: “Nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without the due process of the law.” 

According to 63C American Jurisprudence 2d, Public Officers and Employees, §247 (1999), “As expressed otherwise, the powers delegated to a public officer are held in trust for the people and are to be exercised in behalf of the government or of all citizens who may need the intervention of the officer. Furthermore, the view has been expressed that all public officers, within whatever branch and whatever level of government, and whatever be their private vocations, are trustees of the people, and accordingly labor under every disability and prohibition imposed by law upon trustees relative to the making of personal financial gain from a discharge of their trusts.

 

That is, a public officer occupies a fiduciary relationship to the political entity on whose behalf he or she serves and owes a fiduciary duty to the public. It has been said that the fiduciary responsibilities of a public officer cannot be less than those of a private individual. Furthermore, it has been stated that any enterprise undertaken by the public official which tends to weaken public confidence and undermine the sense of security for individual [PRIVATE] rights is against public policy.”

Oath of Office

TO VIOLATE IS TREASON

In both the u. S Constitution and State Constitutions, public servants are bound to duly accept their oath of office “to preserve, protect and defend the constitution and the American people against enemies both foreign and domestic...so help me God”. Any violation of this oath is an act of treason against humanity. 

Constitutions serve as operation manuals and operational guidelines, and they outline boundaries for those who choose to be “Public Servants.” Contracts make the law and all law is contract. Consider the 13th Amendment- Section 1: “Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.” Unless we as the American private person have opted into being subject to something, the something does not have legitimate control over us. 

As to whether the jurisdiction has been set clear: “The laws of Congress in respect to those matters do not extend into the territorial limits of the states, but have force only in the District of Columbia, and other places that are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the national government,” Catha v. United States, 152 US, at 215. 


In both the u. S Constitution and State Constitutions, public servants are bound to duly accept their oath of office “to preserve, protect and defend the constitution and the American people against enemies both foreign and domestic … so help me God.” Any violation of this oath is an act of treason against humanity. 


In the beginning, it was National power that was feared. Experience has later taught that the power of the State has been tyrannical as well. According to the 5th Amendment, the Nation is forbidden to deprive any one “of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.” Due process of law means, as stated by the Supreme Court in 1908, that no change in ancient procedures can be made which disregards those fundamental principles … which … protect the citizen in his private right and guard him against the arbitrary action of the government.

 

We cannot be deprived by the States without due process of law, that is, without a full hearing and adequate compensation. In the strict legal sense the term “public” only applies to government political and municipal corporations and to no one else.

Black's Law 6th Edition pg 119

PRIVATE VS. PUBLIC

From the 12th day of December in the year 2019, I am issuing this grievance against the individuals and entities responsible for the initiation, enactment, enforcement, and continued allowance of the unconstitutional and thus fraudulent whether premeditated or by accidental actions of the Children's Vaccine Injury Act enacted in 1986 within the 42 U.S.C 300aa-27.

Black's Law Dictionary 6th Edition, page 1195
Private – as affecting or belonging to private individuals, as distinct from the public generally, not official, not clothed with office. (See, People v. Powell, 280, Mich. 699, 274 N. K. 372, 373)


Should you continue to fail to prevent a wrong, having knowledge of the law, the power to prevent, and the legal or moral duty to prevent the wrong, which causes deprivations of my religious and/or civil rights or Liberties, suit can be brought into violations. 


These guarantees have not been given to the American people by any governments, corporations, or individuals, and therefore cannot be removed or violated by any government, corporation, individual, or any action by laws, rules, statutes, statements, or other type of enforcement taken by the aforementioned entities.

The guarantee of the people as defined in the u.S. Constitution are fundamental and unalienable, above any privilege, title, or discretionary authority allowed by the power granted to our government representatives.

Any attempt to violate the fundamental rights of the people, through unlawful policy, unlawful statutes, words, or by force is therefore considered an act of treason as stated in Title 18, U.S.C. Sec, 2381 In the presence of two or more witnesses to the same overt act, or in an open court or law, if you fail to timely move to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States and honor your oath of office, you are subject to the charge of capital felony treason and this violation is an act of war against the domestic individual of the United States of America.

From the 12th day of December in the year 2019, I am issuing this grievance against the individuals and entities responsible for the initiation, enactment, enforcement, and continued allowance of the unconstitutional and thus fraudulent whether premeditated or by accidental actions of the Children's Vaccine Injury Act enacted in 1986 within the 42 U.S.C 300aa-27. 

This crime attempts to remove financial and criminal liability from the manufacturers of vaccines. The act is contingent upon the congressional mandate to provide reports to Alex M. Azar II, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, every two years that prove and demonstrate that due diligence and ongoing research is being conducted by the Director of the Center for Disease Control, Director of the National Institutes of Health Food and the Commissioner of the Drug Administration, Advisory Commission on Childhood Vaccines and the drug manufacturers themselves that demonstrate that vaccines are necessary, safe, and effective. 

Black's Law Dictionary 2nd Edition:

Mandate – A contract by which a lawful business is committed to the management of another, and by him undertaken to be performed gratuitously. The mandatory is bound to the exercise of slight diligence, and is responsible for gross neglect. 

Mandatory – One to whom a mandate is given; one who undertakes without compensation to perform certain duties

©2020 All rights reserved Lawful America