The Vaccine Injury Compensation System
is based on the honor system, relying on untrained parents to report adverse reactions due to the vaccination of their child and follow the appropriate due process to petition their claim with the V.I.C.S. system. Most medical professionals, media, and the regulatory authorities report that vaccines are safe and effective, leaving little reason for parents to inquire about an injury from a vaccine.
Parents can report adverse reactions to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS)in the event that they witness an abnormal reaction or behavior in their child that they attribute to a recent vaccination.(TABLE EX 1L)
However, according to the CDC and the FDA none of the vaccines have been studied to examine the effects of concomitant vaccine usage. (PIPER-TERRY Q. CDC'S DR. KROGER VID. EX1K) Therefore it would be impossible for parents to ever be properly informed about the potential signs to look for in the case of an adverse event because there are no studies that have been done to draw conclusions from to justify the efficacy of vaccines, or to nullify their usage due to other reasons.
(TABLE EX 1L)
New York State GOP is currently trying to implement this same policy in New York State Schools. EX NC9
EXCERPT FROM EX-SR1A
GRANT ID No. R18 HS 01745
Electronic Support for Public Health-Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System
Researchers utilized a tested, automated system to gather information to improve VAERS
Research conducted from 2006-2009
1.4 Million Vaccine Doses
715,000 Patients total
376,452 received 45 different vaccines
35,570 Adverse Reactions were observed
This means that the VAERS is only capturing approximately 1% of the adverse events being caused by vaccines.
In this study the researchers reported:
“Adverse events from drugs and vaccines are common, but under-reported. […] Likewise, fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported. Low reporting rates preclude or slow the identification of ‘problem’ drugs and vaccines that endanger public health. New surveillance methods for drug and vaccine adverse effects are needed.”
The Harvard Pilgrim System has the ability to integrate into the current reporting system to identify 99% more adverse events. This would lead to more accurate data from which to draw conclusions about the safety and efficacy of Vaccines, and in turn build confidence in the usage of vaccines in general.
As an example of the difference in information and the gravity of it, we will use the Adverse events from vaccines reported for 2018. V.A.E.R.S. REPORTED 49,172 ADVERSE EVENTS caused by Vaccines. According to the results discovered in the Harvard Pilgrim study that would actually mean there were 4,868,028 ADVERSE EVENTS CAUSED BY VACCINES IN 2018.
This information was shared with Human Health Services as this study was funded by a Federal grant under the umbrella of The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
PRESENTMENT FOR GRAND JURY INVESTIGATION: CIVIL, AND CRIMINAL CHARGES
With this obvious improvement in data acquisition, as proven in the Harvard Pilgrim Study, the Center for Disease Control has an ethical obligation to act in the best interests of the American people. The study was funded by a Federal Grant and the researchers worked closely with the CDC throughout the 3 year study that followed over 700,000 people.
The methods and equipment were approved by the CDC and the alleged intent was to see how V.A.E.R.S. was working to gather the best evidence to see where there were problems and potential areas for improvement in the product that they regulate, mandate, and profit from.
CDC & FDA IGNORING AND ENABLING
However, according to the researchers at the Harvard Pilgrim study the CDC completely cut off all communication. After 3 years of research together with the revelation of earthshaking results, and a new fully operational, integrative reliable adverse events reporting system, the potential to save hundreds of thousands of lives, if not millions was a very tangible possibility. Despite repeated attempts to reach their primary contact at the CDC, public presentations at symposiums around the nation, and a clear public out cry to produce better vaccines, the CDC completely ignored the data that revealed that the V.A.E.R.S. system that they are still using today only gathers approximately 1% of the adverse events caused by vaccines.
Some serious conclusions can be drawn from
both the FDA admitting that they were not compliant with the research and reporting required by Congress under the 42 U.S. Code § 300aa–27. mandate for safer childhood vaccines, in that they did not do any research or produce report to show that the vaccines being produced were safer and more effective (EX-SR1A), and the CDC's response, or lack there of, after a study they funded showed that their system was only gathering 1% of the actual data they needed to assess whether or not the vaccines they continue to promote are even safe, let alone effective.
The CDC and the FDA fall under the umbrella as contractors of the Human Health Services Division of the Federal Government. They are both private organizations registered as foreign agents and have sworn an oath to uphold the American Constitution which is their contractual obligation to do.
Unfortunately, Human Health Services follows statutes created by foreign agents rather than upholding the fundamental rights of the American people guaranteed in the Constitution. The President issued an executive order in January of 2018 to ensure HHS supported the people's right to exercise their religious and conscience freedoms in reference to the choice to be or not to be vaccinated. The most recent update on that order demonstrates their belligerent disregard for rights of the American people;
Conscience Rule Vacated
On January 26, 2018, the HHS Office for Civil Rights published a notice of proposed rulemaking entitled “Protecting Statutory Conscience Rights in Health Care; Delegations of Authority.” After 60 days of public comment, OCR published a final rule on May 21, 2019. That rule was challenged in federal court. In November 2019, before the rule became effective, a federal court vacated the 2019 final conscience rule.
Under court order, the 2019 rule will remain vacated and not in effect unless OCR receives further direction from the courts. At the same time, OCR can and will continue to receive and investigate complaints under its 2011 conscience rule and HHS’s statutory authority under conscience and religious freedom laws enacted by Congress, to the extent not prohibited by court order. One court stated,
“The 2011 Rule, which has governed HHS’s administration of the Conscience Provisions for eight years and is unaffected by this decision, will remain in place, and continue to provide a basis for HHS to enforce these laws” (New York v. HHS, No. 19-cv-4676-PAE doc # 248 (S.D.N.Y. Nov 6, 2019 at *144)."-HHS.GOV
THE CDC IS FOLLOWING THE POLICIES DICTATED BY THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION UNDER THE JURISDICTION OF THE UNITED NATIONS.
At the NOVEMBER, 2019 CDC Meeting in Atlanta Georgia, the CDC began dictating policy to the Federal and State Governments. They stated that they...
"have determined that the State Health Departments must work to remove all exemptions (concerning mandatory vaccination) through 2020."
The CDC is unlawfully acting as a defacto government and is thus usurping the authority of the American Republic. They have no authority to "determine" anything that removes the fundamental rights of an American's parental responsibility for the care, custody and control of their child,1st Amendment Rights, or to violate State, National, and International Law.
Informed Consent is not a power that rests with the CDC or any other organization, entity, government, or individual outside of the personal choice of every American. The fundamental and human rights of the people are not provided to them by any government and therefore cannot be taken away by them, or any contractor thereof.
We do not contract with these organizations.
We as the American people have not been presented, nor agreed to any such contract with the CDC, FDA, or HHS, and according to the Constitution, we could not turn over our fundamental rights even if we wanted to, or even in the case of an emergency. (EX1J)
The consistent actions of the FDA, CDC, and HHS to approve, create, label, manufacture, and distribute over 50 NEW VACCINES since they were given immunity from civil suit in 1988 is a criminal enterprise allowing them to monopolize a unique segment of the medical economy. They have been enabled by Congress and the U.S. Corporation to create biological weapons that are being distributed to the masses and have changed the laws to operate with virtually no oversight.
We hold these CONTRACTED FOREIGN AGENCIES in contempt of the American People, having violated international laws under the Nuremburg Code
(EX-SR1M) of informed consent, as well as a breach of trust of the people by not pursuing obvious courses of action that would be in the best interests of the health, vitality and well being of the American people.
"While an emergency can not create power and no emergency justifies the violation of any of the provisions of the United States Constitution or States Constitutions..."16AmJur2d., Sec. 98:
The Guardian of Camelot
As is our right as indigenous residents to this land, we do not consent to the unlawful governance of Foreign Agency's or Agents violating the only true Law of the Land, the Constitution. We have implemented this Court to rectify the wrong's committed against the American people and give all parties the opportunity to rectify the damages caused and face their accuser.
The evidence of these crimes against humanity and violations of our Fundamental Rights are detailed as needed within this website to allow the people to vote officially to call a Grand Jury and hold the guilty parties accountable for their crimes.